|
The Plain Truth About CHRISTMAS
Chapter 1, by Herbert W.
Armstrong, copyrights 1952, 1972, 1974 Chapter 2, by Keith W. Stump,
copyright 1985 Chapter 3, by John Halford,
copyright 1985 Chapter 4, WCG, copyright 1986
Where did the world get.
Christmas?...from the Bible, or from paganism? Here
are the astonishing facts which may shock you! Test yourself. How much do you
know of the origin of the Christmas tree--of "Santa Claus--of the
mistletoe--of the holly wreath--of the custom of exchanging gifts?
Chapter 1
THE PLAIN TRUTH ABOUT
CHRISTMAS
WHEN I was a very little boy, I
was taught to hang up my stockings on Christmas eve. When I awakened the next
morning, they were filled with small toys and sacks or little boxes of candy
and nuts. And beside the mantle, from which my stockings hung, a Christmas
tree had suddenly appeared, decorated with shiny tinsel. And on it hung
presents. Other presents for us children were piled on the floor underneath.
I was told Santa Claus had come down the chimney during the night and left
all these things. But did I question what my parents had told me? Of course
not. I accepted it--took it all for granted. Didn't you? Stop and think a
moment! Very few have ever reflected on why they believe what they do--why
they follow the customs they do, or from where those customs came. We were
born into a world filled with customs. We grew up accepting them without
question. Why? Sheep instinct? Well, not exactly. But by nature we do tend to
follow the crowd, whether right or wrong. Sheep follow others to the
slaughter. Humans ought to check up where they are going. How--when did
Christmas originate? Does Christmas really celebrate the birthday of Christ?
Was Jesus born on December 25th? Did the original apostles, who knew Jesus
personally and were taught by Him, celebrate His birthday on December 25th?
Did they celebrate it at all? If Christmas is the chief of the Christian
holidays, why do so many non-Christians observe it? Do you know? Why do people exchange presents with family members, friends,
relatives, at Christmas time? Was it because the wise men presented gifts to
the Christ-child? The answer may surprise you. Most people have
"supposed" a lot of things about Christmas that are not true. But
let's quit "supposing" and get the facts!
What Encyclopedias Say
The word "Christmas"
means "Mass of Christ," or, as it came to be shortened, "Christ-Mass."
It came to non-Christians and Protestants from the Roman Catholic Church. And
where did they get it? NOT from the New Testament--NOT from the Bible--NOT
from the original apostles who were personally instructed by Christ--but it gravitated
in the fourth century into the Roman Church from paganism. Since the
celebration of Christmas has come to the world from the Roman Catholic
Church, and has no authority but that of the Roman Catholic Church, let us
examine the Catholic Encyclopedia, 1911 edition, published by that church.
Under the heading "Christmas," you will find: "Christmas was
not among the earliest festivals of the Church...the first evidence of the
feast is from Egypt." "Pagan customs centering around the January
calends gravitated to Christmas." And in the same encyclopedia, under
the heading "Natal Day," we find that the early Catholic father, Origen, acknowledged this truth: "... In the
Scriptures, no one [who obeyed God] is recorded to have kept a feast or held
a great banquet on his birthday. It is only sinners [like Pharaoh and Herod]
who make great rejoicings over the day in which they were born into this
world" (emphasis ours). Encyclopaedia
Britannica, 1946 edition, has this: "Christmas (i.e., the Mass of
Christ).... Christmas was not among the earliest festivals of the
church...." It was not instituted by Christ or the apostles, or by Bible
authority. It was picked up afterward from paganism. The Encyclopedia
Americana, 1944 edition, says: "Christmas.... It was, according to many
authorities, not celebrated in the first centuries of the Christian church,
as the Christian usage in general was to celebrate the death of remarkable
persons rather than their birth...." (The "Communion," which
is instituted by New Testament Bible authority, is a memorial of the death of
Christ.) "... A feast was established in memory of this event [Christ's
birth] in the fourth century. In the fifth century the Western
Church ordered it to be celebrated forever on the day of the
old Roman feast of the birth of Sol, as no certain knowledge of the day of
Christ's birth existed." Now notice! These recognized historical
authorities show Christmas was not observed by Christians for the first two
or three hundred years--a period longer than the entire history of the United States as a nation! It got into the Western, or Roman, Church,
by the fourth century A.D. It was not until the fifth century that the Roman
Church ordered it to be celebrated as an official Christian festival!
Jesus Not Born December 25th
Jesus was not even born in the
winter season! When the Christ-child was born "there were in the same
country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by
night" (Luke 2:8). This never could have occurred in Judea in
the month of December. The shepherds always brought their flocks from the
mountainsides and fields and corralled them not later than October 15, to
protect them from the cold, rainy season that followed that date. Notice that
the Bible itself proves, in Song of Solomon 2:11 and Ezra 10:9, 13, that
winter was a rainy season not permitting shepherds to abide in open fields at
night. "It was an ancient custom among Jews of those days to send out
their sheep to the fields and deserts about the Passover (early spring), and
bring them home at commencement of the first rain," says the Adam Clarke
Commentary (Vol. 5, page 370, New York ed.). Continuing, this authority states: "During
the time they were out, the shepherds watched them night and day. As...the first rain began early in the month of Marchesvan, which answers to part of our October and
November [begins sometime in October], we find that the sheep were kept out
in the open country during the whole summer. And, as these shepherds had not
yet brought home their flocks, it is a presumptive argument that October had
not yet commenced, and that, consequently, our Lord was not born on the 25th
of December, when no flocks were out in the fields; nor could He have been
born later than September, as the flocks were still in the fields by night.
On this very ground, the nativity in December should be given up. The feeding
of the flocks by night in the fields is a chronological fact..." Many
encyclopedias and other authorities affirm that Christ was not born on
December 25. Even the Catholic Encyclopedia frankly states this fact. The
exact date of Jesus' birth is entirely unknown, as all authorities
acknowledge. Chapter 2 of this booklet covers scriptures which at least
strongly indicate it was in the early fall--probably September-- approximately
six months after Passover. If God had wished us to observe and celebrate
Christ's birthday, He would not have so completely hidden the exact date.
How This Pagan Custom Got
into the Church
Then how did this pagan custom
creep into the Western Christian world? The New Schaff-Herzog
Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge explains it clearly, in its article on
"Christmas": "How much the date of the festival depended upon
the pagan Brumalia (Dec. 25) following the
Saturnalia (Dec. 17-24), and celebrating the shortest day of the year and the
'new sun'... cannot be accurately determined. The pagan Saturnalia and Brumalia were too deeply entrenched in popular custom to
be set aside by Christian influence .... The pagan
festival with its riot and merrymaking was so popular that Christians were
glad of an excuse to continue its celebration with little change in spirit
and in manner. Christian preachers of the West and the Near East
protested against the unseemly frivolity with which Christ's birthday was
celebrated, while Christians of Mesopotamia accused their Western brethren of
idolatry and sun worship for adopting as Christian this pagan festival."
Remember, the Roman world had been pagan. Prior to the fourth century,
Christians were few in number, though increasing, and were persecuted by the
government and by pagans. But, with the advent of Constantine as emperor, who made his profession of Christianity in
the fourth century, placing Christianity on an equal footing with paganism,
people of the Roman world began to accept this now-popular Christianity by
the hundreds of thousands. But remember, these people had grown up in pagan
customs, chief of which was this idolatrous festival of December 25th. It was
a festival of merrymaking, with its special spirit. They enjoyed it! They
didn't want to give it up! Now this same article in the New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge
explains how the recognition by Constantine of Sunday, which had been the day
of pagan sun worship, and how the influence of the pagan Manichaeism, which
identified the SON of God with the physical SUN, gave these pagans of the
fourth century, now turning over wholesale to "Christianity," their
excuse for calling their pagan festival date of December 25th (birthday of the
SUN-god), the birthday of the SON of God. And that is how
"Christmas" became fastened on our Western world! We may call it by
another name, but it's the same old pagan sun-worshipping festival still! The
only change is in what we call it! You can call a rabbit a "lion,"
but it's still a rabbit, just the same. Again from the Encyclopaedia
Britannica: "Certain Latins, as early as 354,
may have transferred the birthday from January 6th to December 25, which was
then a Mithraic feast...or birthday of the Unconquered
SUN... The Syrians and Armenians, who clung to January 6th, accused the
Romans of sun worship and idolatry, contending...that the feast of December 25th, had been invented by disciples of Cerinthus...."
The Real Origin of Christmas
But if we got Christmas from the
Roman Catholics, and they got it from paganism, where did the pagans get it?
Where, when, and what was its real origin? It originated in ancient Egypt in the days of King Osiris and
Queen Isis, and their son Horus, about 3,000 B.C.
Yes, it stems from roots whose beginning was long before the Flood! From many
ancient writings, considerable is learned of this man, who started in Egypt a great organized worldly apostasy from God that has
dominated this world until now. After the untimely death of King Osiris, his wife, Isis, propagated the doctrine of the
survival of Osiris as a spirit being. She claimed a
full-grown evergreen tree sprang overnight from a dead tree stump, which
symbolized the springing forth unto new life of the dead Osiris.
On each anniversary of his birth, she claimed, Osiris
would visit the evergreen tree and leave gifts upon it. December 25th was the
birthday of King Osiris reborn as the son Horus. This is the real origin of the Christmas tree.
Through her scheming and designing, Isis became the
"Queen of Heaven," and Osiris under
various names, became the reborn "divine son of
heaven." Through the generations, in this idolatrous worship, Osiris also became, among the later Phoeniceans,
Baal the Sun-god. In this false system, reintroduced at Babylon, after the Flood, by Nimrod (see Genesis 10 and 11), the
"Mother and Child" (Isis and Osiris
reborn) became chief objects of worship. This worship of "Mother and
Child" spread over the world. The names varied in different countries
and languages. In Asia the worship passed under the names of Cybele and Deoius. In Rome, Fortuna and Jupiterpuer. Even
in Greece, China, Japan and Tibet is to be found the counterpart of the Madonna, long
before the birth of Christ! Thus, during the fourth and fifth centuries, when
the pagans of the Roman world were "accepting" the new popular
"Christianity" by the hundreds of thousands, carrying their old
pagan customs and beliefs along with them, merely cloaking them with Christian-sounding
names, the Madonna and "Mother and Child" idea also became
popularized, especially at Christmas time. Every Christmas season you'll hear
sung and chanted dozens of times the hymn "Silent Night, Holy
Night," with its familiar "Mother and Child" theme. We, who
have been born in such a world, reared and steeped in these things all our
lives, have been taught to revere these things as holy and sacred. We never
questioned to see where they came from--whether they came from the Bible, or
from pagan idolatry! We are shocked to learn the truth--some, unfortunately,
take offense at the plain truth! But God commands His faithful ministers,
"Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and show my
people their transgression!" Shocking as these facts are, they are the
plain facts of history and the Bible! The origin of Christmas goes back to
ancient times. It is bound up in the apostasy which has gripped a deceived
world these many centuries! In Egypt, it was always believed that the husband of Isis
(Egyptian name for "Queen of Heaven") was reborn as the son Horus on December 25th. Through the influence of Egypt and, later, Babylon over civilization, the nations celebrated this famous
birthday over most of the known world for centuries before the birth of
Christ. December 25th is not the birthday of Jesus the true Christ! The
apostles and early true Church never celebrated Christ's birthday at any
time. There is no command or instruction to celebrate it in the Bible--
rather, the celebrating of birthdays is a pagan, not a Christian custom. Thus
the ancient idolatrous "Mysteries," have been handed down through
the pagan religions under new Christian-sounding names.
Origin of Holly Wreath,
Mistletoe, Yule Log
Now where did we get this
mistletoe custom? Among the ancient pagans the mistletoe was used at this
festival of the winter solstice because it was considered sacred to the sun,
because of its supposed miraculous healing power. The pagan custom of kissing
under the mistletoe was an early step in the night of revelry and drunken
debauchery--celebrating the death of the "old sun" and the birth of
the new at the winter solstice. Mistletoe, sacred in pagan festivals, is a
parasite! Holly berries were also considered sacred to the sun-god. The Yule
log is in reality the "sun log." "Yule" means
"wheel," a pagan symbol of the sun. Yet today professing Christians
speak of the "sacred Yule-tide season"! Even the lighting of fires
and candles as a Christian ceremony is merely a continuation of the pagan
custom, encouraging the waning sun-god as he reached the lowest place in the
southern skies! The Encyclopedia Americana says: "The holly, the
mistletoe, the Yule log...are relics of pre-Christian times." Of
paganism! The book 10,000 Answers to Questions, compiled by Frederic J. Haskins,
says: "The use of the Christmas wreath is believed by authorities to be
traceable to the pagan custom of decorating buildings and places of worship
at the feast which took place at the same time as our Christmas." Also:
"The Christmas tree is from Egypt, and its origin dates from a period long anterior to the
Christian Era" (italics ours).
Yes, and Even Santa Claus!
But what about dear old Santa
Claus? Is he as benevolent and holy as many suppose! The name "Santa
Claus" is a corruption of the name "St. Nicholas," a Roman
Catholic bishop who lived in the 4th century. Look in the Encyclopaedia
Britannica, volume 19, pages 648-649, 11th edition, where you'll read:
"St. Nicholas, bishop of Myra, a saint honored by the Greeks and Latins
on the 6th of December.... A legend of his surreptitious bestowal of dowries
on the three daughters of an impoverished citizen...is said to have
originated the old custom of giving presents in secret on the Eve of St.
Nicholas [Dec. 6], subsequently transferred to Christmas day. Hence the
association of Christmas with Santa Claus...." Through the year, parents
punish their children for telling falsehoods. Then, at Christmas time, they
themselves tell their little children this "Santa Claus" lie! Is it
any wonder many of them, when they grow up and learn the truth, begin to
believe God is a myth, too? One little fellow, sadly disillusioned about
"Santa Claus," said to a playmate, "Yes, and I'm going to look
into this 'Jesus Christ' business, too!" Is it Christian to teach
children myths and falsehoods? God says, "Thou shalt
not bear false witness!" It may seem right, and be justified by human
reason, but God says, "There is a way that seemeth
right to a man, but the end thereof are the ways of
death!" "Old Nick" also is a term for the devil! Is there a
connection? Satan appears as an "angel of light," to deceive! (II Cor. 11:14; Rev. 12:9.) And so when we examine the facts,
we are astonished to learn that the practice of observing Christmas is not,
after all, a true biblical practice, but a human custom--one of the ways of Babylon our people have fallen into! But when it comes to the
most important part of all in this Christmas observance--the Christmas
shopping season--the buying and exchanging of gifts--many will exclaim triumphantly,
"Well, at least the Bible tells us to do that! Didn't the wise men give
gifts when Christ was born?" Again, we are due for some surprises, when
we learn the plain truth. Let's look at the historic origin of trading gifts,
then see exactly what the Bible does say about it.
Isn't Exchanging Gifts
Scriptural?
From the Bibliotheca Sacra,
volume 12, pages 153-155, we quote: "The interchange of presents between
friends is alike characteristic of Christmas and the Saturnalia, and must
have been adopted by Christians from the Pagans, as the admonition of Tertullian plainly shows." The fact is, this custom
fastened upon people of exchanging gifts with friends and relatives at the
Christmas season has not a single trace of Christianity about it, strange
though that may seem! This does not celebrate Christ's birthday nor honor it
or Him! Suppose someone you love has a birthday. You want to honor that
person on his or her birthday. Would you lavishly buy gifts for everyone
else, trading gifts back and forth with all your other friends and loved
ones, but ignore completely any gift for the one whose birthday you are
honoring? Rather absurd, when viewed in that light, isn't it? Yet this is
exactly what people the world over are doing! They honor a day that is not
Christ's birthday by spending every dime they can scrape together in buying
presents to trade back and forth among friends and relatives. But I can say
by years of experience, as I believe most pastors and ministers can say, that when the month of December rolls around, nearly
all professing Christians forget to give gifts to Christ and His cause almost
altogether! December often is the most difficult month to keep Christ's work
from dying! People are too busy trading gifts to think of Him and His Work,
it seems. Then, in January and even into February it seems they have to catch
up from what they spent for Christmas, so they seldom get back to normal in
supporting Christ and His Work before March! Now consider what the Bible says
about the wise men giving gifts when Christ was born. It is in Matthew
2:1-11. "Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea
in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews?... And when they were come into the house, they saw the
young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when
they had opened their treasures, they presented unto HIM gifts; gold, and
frankincense, and myrrh." Notice, they inquired for the child Jesus, who
was born KING of the Jews! Now why did they present gifts to Him? Because it
was His birthday? Not at all, because they came several days or weeks after
the date of His birth! Are we to see in this an example for us, today, to
trade gifts back and forth among ourselves? No, notice carefully! They did
not exchange gifts among themselves, but "they presented unto HIM
gifts." They gave their gifts to Christ, not to their friends,
relatives, or one another!
Gifts for a King
Why? Let me quote from the Adam
Clarke Commentary, volume 5, page 46: "Verse 11. (They presented unto
him gifts.) The people of the east never approach the presence of kings and
great personages, without a present in their hands. The custom is often
noticed in the Old Testament..." There it is! They were not instituting
a new Christian custom of exchanging gifts with friends to honor Christ's
birthday. They were following an old and ancient eastern custom of presenting
gifts to a king when they came into his presence. They were approaching Him,
born KING of the Jews, in person. Therefore custom required they present
gifts--even as the Queen of Sheba brought gifts to Solomon--even as many
people today take a gift along when they visit, for example, the White House
for an appointment with the President. No, the custom of trading gifts back
and forth does not stem from this scriptural incident at all, but rather, as
quoted from history above, it is the continuance of an ancient pagan custom.
Instead of honoring Christ, it invariably retards His Work, often sets it
back, at the Christmas season every year.
Does It Really Honor Christ?
Now come two arguments often
used to justify Christmas observance. (1) Many will reason this way:
"But, even though the exact date of Jesus' birth is unknown, should we
not select some date to celebrate as His birthday?" The answer is
positively no! Did you not notice the statement quoted earlier from the
Catholic Encyclopedia that sinners alone celebrate their birthdays? The
celebration of birthdays is not a Christian, but a pagan custom, observed by
sinners! (2) But, many still reason, "Even so--even though Christmas was
a pagan custom, honoring the false sun-god, we don't observe it to honor the
false god, we observe it to honor Christ." But how does GOD answer in
His Word? "Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following
them [the pagans in their customs]...that thou inquire not after their gods,
saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even
so will I do likewise. Thou shalt not do so unto
the Lord thy God: for every abomination to the Lord, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods" (Deut. 12:30-31). God says plainly in His Instruction Book to us,
that He will not accept that kind of worship, even though intended in His honor.
To Him, He says, it is offering what is abominable to Him, and therefore it
honors, not Him, but false pagan gods. GOD says we must not worship Him
according to the "dictates of our own conscience"--a term we often
hear. But Jesus said plainly, "God is a spirit: and they that worship
him must worship him in spirit and in truth" (John 4:24). And what is truth? God's Word--the Holy Bible--said
Jesus, is truth (John 17:17); and
the Bible says God will not accept worship when people take a pagan custom or
manner of worship and try to honor Christ with it. Again, Jesus said:
"In vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of
men" (Matt. 15:9). Christmas observance is a tradition of men, and the
commandments of God, as quoted, forbid it. Jesus said, further, "full
well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own
tradition." That is precisely what the millions are doing today. They
ignore the commandment of God. He commands, regarding taking the customs of
the pagans and using them to honor or worship God: "Thou shalt not do so unto the Lord thy God." Still, most
people today take that command of God lightly, or as having no validity
whatsoever, and follow the tradition of men in observing Christmas. We have
professed to be Christian nations, but we're in Babylon, as Bible prophecy foretold, and we don't know it!
"Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and
that ye receive not of her plagues"--soon to fall--is the warning of
Revelation 18:4. Make no mistake! God will allow you to defy and disobey Him.
He will allow you to follow the crowd and the traditions of men. He will
allow you to sin. But He also says there is a day of reckoning coming. As you
sow, so shall you reap! Jesus was the living Word of God in Person, and the
Bible is the written Word of God. And we shall be judged, for eternity, by
these words! They should not be taken lightly or ignored.
Chapter 2
JESUS' BIRTH--THE UNTOLD
STORY
Was Jesus born in December? If
not, when was he born? And in what year? Anyway, what difference does it
make? These are questions often asked. It is time they were answered!
A Visit to Bethlehem
In late December of each year,
thousands of tourists flock into the small town of Bethlehem in the Judean Hills south of Jerusalem to participate in annual Christmas celebrations there.
Some make the 6-mile journey from Jerusalem on foot. Upon arrival, they crowd with silent awe into
the paved expanse of Manger
Square in front
of the revered Church of the Nativity, built over the traditional site of
Jesus' birth. Inevitably, some of these tourists arrive in Israel unprepared. They have not thoroughly studied their
guidebooks. As they step off their plane, they receive a real shock! November
through early March is "winter" in Israel! The weather gets cold, especially at night. Often it
rains--or even snows! Yet many arrive in Israel carrying luggage bulging with summer attire, reasoning
that it is always hot and arrid in the Middle East.
So they hurriedly purchase coats and sweaters in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem for their pilgrimage down to Bethlehem. Nevertheless, most of those who stand in Manger Square on December 25 each year--prepared and unprepared
alike--fail to perceive the message being proclaimed by the very weather
around them! Notice this plain testimony of your Bible: On the day of Jesus'
birth "there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field,
keeping watch over their flock by night" (Luke 2:8). The shepherds were
living out in the open fields, tending their flock through the night. The
point? Ask any biblical scholar, or any modern Israeli: This never could have
occurred in Judea in the month of December--nor even in November, or late
October for that matter! In ancient times as today, shepherds brought their
flocks in from the fields and penned them in shelters not later than the
middle of October! This was necessary to protect them from the cold, rainy
season that usually followed that date. (The Bible itself makes it clear that
winter in Palestine is a rainy season; see Ezra 10:9, 13; Song of Solomon
2:11.) Yet Luke 2:8 tells us that at the time of Jesus' birth, the shepherds
were yet abiding in the fields--by night, at that! They had not yet brought
their flocks home to the sheepfolds. Clearly the
cold, rainy season had not yet commenced. Thus, on the basis of Luke's
testimony alone, we see that Jesus could have been born no later than
mid-October--when the weather is still pleasant at Bethlehem. A December 25 nativity is too late!
More Proof
Additional biblical evidence
lends further support to the foregoing conclusion. Luke 1:24-38 informs us
that the virgin Mary miraculously became pregnant with Jesus when her cousin
Elizabeth was six months pregnant with a child who would later be known as
John the Baptist. Jesus, then, would have been born six months after John. If
we could know the time of John's birth, we could then simply add six months
and know the time of Jesus' birth. Does the Bible reveal the general time of
John's birth? Notice: Elizabeth's husband Zacharias was a
priest at the temple in Jerusalem. Luke 1:5 records that Zacharias
was "of the course of Abia [in Hebrew, Abijah]." In the days of King David of ancient Israel (10th century B.C.), the number of priests had so increased
that they had to be divided into 24 courses or shifts, which would take turns
in performing the priestly duties (I Chron. 24).
Each course served one week at a time, beginning and ending on a weekly
Sabbath day (II Chron. 23:8). The course of Abijah was the eighth course or shift in the rotation (I Chron. 24:10). The Talmud (collection of Jewish civil and
religious laws and commentaries) records that the first course performed its
duties in the first week of the first month of the Hebrew calendar. This
month (called Abib or Nisan) begins about the start
of spring in the Northern Hemisphere. The second course worked the second
week. The third week--being the annual festival season of Passover and the
Days of Unleavened Bread--found all 24 courses serving together, sharing the
heavy duties of that special time. The third shift then took its turn during
the fourth week of the year. Projecting forward, the eighth course--the
course of Abijah, in which Zacharias
served--worked the ninth week of the year. But Zacharias'
course then stayed on at the temple to serve the 10th week also--the week of
the annual Pentecost festival--along with all the other courses. It was
during that two-week period of work--near the end of spring-- that the
announcement by the archangel Gabriel came to Zacharias
regarding his wife's imminent conception (Luke 1:8-20). When his two weeks'service was completed, Zacharias
and Elizabeth went back to their home and Elizabeth conceived (verses 23-24)--sometime late in June or early
July. The rest is a matter of biology and arithmetic. Elizabeth's sixth month of pregnancy would have been in December.
She would have given birth three months later--in late March or early April
of the following year. Six months after that, Jesus would have been born, in
late September or early October--before the sheep were brought in from the
fields, as we have seen! Clearly, Jesus was not born in December. Late
September or early October was also the time of year that taxes were
customarily paid--in the fall, at the end of the harvest. Joseph and Mary, it
will be remembered, had journeyed to Bethlehem to be taxed (Luke 2:3-5). The fact that there was
"no room for them in the inn" (Luke 2:7) also suggests the time of
the autumn harvest, because the annual fall festivals occurring at that time
attracted multitudes of Jews to Jerusalem and nearby towns, filling all
available accommodations.
Jesus Born "Before
Christ"?
An even more frequent question
received from readers concerns the year of Jesus' birth. Few subjects are
fraught with so much confusion and misunderstanding. This immediately brings
up a preliminary question: How could Jesus have been born in a year
"B.C."--Before Christ--as most authorities suggest? It would seem
to be a contradiction in terms! First, understand that the manner of
reckoning time according to B.C. and A.D. was devised hundreds of years after
Jesus' birth. It was invented in the sixth century A.D. by a monk in Italy name Dionysius Exiguus. This
Dionysius misunderstood the time of the reign of Herod the Great, king of Judea. So
he reckoned the birth of Jesus to have occurred in December of the year 753
AUC (ab urbe condita--"from the foundation of the city [of Rome]"). In past ages, time was often reckoned using the
founding of Rome as the starting point for counting. Thus, in Dionysius'
new system, January 1, 754
AUC, became January 1,-- A.D. 1 (anno
Domini, "in the year of the Lord"). That
is, he assumed Jesus was born on December 25, just a week before January 1, A.D. 1.
Error Later Discovered
Later, it was discovered that
Dionysius had been incorrect in his reckoning of the reign of Herod and hence
of the commencement of the Christian era. Jesus had been born some years
earlier than Dionysius had thought. But by then, the new chronology was in
general use and it was too late to change! It has continued in use throughout
most of the world to the present day. With that understanding, we can now
proceed to determine the year of Jesus' birth. There are several ways of
doing so. Notice, first, this ancient prophecy from the book of Daniel:
"Know therefore and understand, that from the
going forth of the commandment to restore and to build from Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and
threescore and two weeks..." (Dan. 9:25). The commandment or decree to
restore and build Jerusalem was made in the seventh year of the reign of Artaxerxes I, king of ancient Persia (see Ezra
7:8)--according to the autumn-to-autumn reckoning of the Jews, in 457 B.C.
The archangel Gabriel told Daniel that there would be a total of 69 prophetic
weeks from that time until the public appearance of the Messiah. Sixty-nine weeks is equivalent to 483 days (69 x 7). A day
of prophetic fulfillment is a year in actual time (Num. 14:34; Ezek. 4:6). So 483 prophetic days (69 prophetic weeks)
is 483 years. Simple arithmetic now takes over. Four-hundred-eighty-three
years from 457 B.C. (the year of the decree) brings us to A.D. 27--the year
when Jesus, the Messiah, began his public ministry. (In calculating this, be
aware that you must add 1 to compensate for the fact that there is no year
zero.) Now consider further: It is generally understood that Jesus entered
upon his ministry in the autumn of the year, immediately after his baptism.
(His ministry lasted 3 1/2 years, ending in the spring, at Passover time.) In
Luke 3:23 we learn that Jesus was "about thirty years of
age" when he began his ministry. If he was about 30 years old in the
autumn of A.D. 27, then he must have been born in the end of summer or early
autumn and in 4 B.C.! (remember, there is no year
zero.) It thus stands clearly revealed from Daniel's prophecy that Jesus was
born in 4 B.C. But there is yet further proof!
Herod's Eclipse
Students of the Bible recognize
that Jesus was born before the death of Herod the Great (Matt. 2:15, 19). When did Herod die? The first century A.D. Jewish
historian Flavius Josephus, in Antiquities of the Jews (book XVII, chapter
vi), tells of an eclipse of the moon late in Herod's reign. I have before me,
as I write, the authoritative Solar and Lunar Eclipses of the Ancient Near
East by Kudlek and Mickler.
Its tables reveal that the lunar eclipse in question occurred on March 13, 4
B.C. Continuing with Josephus' account, we discover that sometime after the
eclipse, Herod--afflicted with a painful and loathsome disease--went beyond
the river Jordan to bathe himself in hot springs there. The cures he
undertook were unsuccessful. His condition worsened and he returned to Jericho. There, in a wild rage, he plotted the deaths of many
prominent Jews. He also ordered his own son, Antipater,
slain. All these events required some months. Josephus further reveals
(chapter ix) that Herod's death occurred sometime before a spring Passover.
This Passover would have been 13 months after the eclipse, or the Passover of
April, 3 B.C. This confirms our previously calculated 4 B.C. birthdate for Jesus. Further corroborating this, Josephus
also records (XVII, viii, 1) that at his death, Herod had reigned 37 years
since he had been declared king by the Romans. That had occurred in 40 B.C.,
a fact that Dionysius overlooked. Herod's death therefore took place late in
4 B.C.--more specifically, according to a Jewish tradition, on the seventh
day of the lunar month Kislev in the Hebrew calendar (equivalent to
November/December on the Roman calendar)--shortly after Jesus' birth in the
early autumn of 4 B.C. This is the only date that is consistent with all the
provable facts!
The "Star" of Bethlehem
A word is necessary at this
point about the celebrated "Star of Bethlehem" (Matt. 2) that
guided the wise men (Greek, Magi) across the deserts of the East to Bethlehem. The Plain Truth receives many letters about this each
December. Scholars have tried to pinpoint the date of Jesus' birth by means
of astronomical calculations related to the appearance of this mysterious
"star." For centuries, theologians and astronomers have debated
this perplexing question. Dozens of theories exist purporting to explain what
this "star" actually was and when it appeared. Some hold it was a
comet. Others postulate a nova (exploding star). Still others say it was a
meteor, or a planet, or a conjunction of two or more planets. (A conjunction
takes place when planets appear, from our earthly viewpoint, to briefly
become a single bright object as their paths cross the sky.) Dates for
proposed celestial phenomena usually range from 7 B.C. to 2 B.C. But the
heart and core of the star controversy goes beyond matters of astronomy. To
one who believes that the Bible is the Word of God and is to be taken at face
value, the account of the star in Matthew's gospel can have only one
explanation. It was clearly and incontrovertibly a miracle, of supernatural,
not natural origin! What natural phenomenon in the heavens--whether comet,
meteor, exploding star or planet--could "go before" the Magi and
"stand over" a specific house to precisely pinpoint it (Matt.
2:9-11)? And if it was attributable to a nonmiraculous
agency, how can we account that it appeared and reappeared to the Magi and
apparently went generally unnoticed by others? Natural explanations are sheer
astronomical foolishness! If the biblical account cannot be accepted in all
its details, why should anyone believe it has any merit at all? The star was
clearly a special miracle of God, of divine origin defying all the proposed
natural explanations of liberal scholarship. It is quite possible that the
Star of Bethlehem was simply an angel sent to lead the Magi to Jesus, since
the Bible often symbolically uses stars to signify angels (Job 38:7; Jude 13;
Rev. 1:20; 9:1; 12:14; et al.).
In Jesus' Name?
We have seen the proof that
Jesus was born in the early autumn, not in the winter. But, some will ask,
what difference does it make? Is it not the thought that counts? What is
wrong with celebrating a day--any day--in honor of Jesus' birth? Each
December, articles inevitably appear in newspapers and magazines pointing out
the ancient origins of today's Christmas customs. All authorities agree that
the customs surrounding Christmas--the Christmas tree, mistletoe, holly
wreaths, yule logs, stockings on the hearth,
exchanging gifts and so on--were practiced in connection with pagan religious
celebrations centuries before the birth of Jesus. None are of Christian
origin! Anciently, December 25 was the date of the pagan Roman Brumalia, the final day of the popular weeklong
Saturnalia celebration, celebrated in honor of the god Saturn. It was the day
of the "invincible sun"--a winter solstice festival. "Christmas"
was not among the earliest festivals of the Church. It was not until the
mid-fourth century that Pope Julius I decreed December 25 to be Christmas
("Christ-Mass") Day. He sought to overshadow the popular Brumalia by imparting "Christian" connotations
to the day. But again, some will ask: What is so wrong with borrowing some of
those early customs and using them to honor Jesus? May we not continue to
celebrate December 25, as long as we do it in Jesus' name? Can pagan
practices be "Christianized" in this way? More than 34 centuries
ago, the rebellious children of Israel fashioned a pagan idol--a golden calf--in the wilderness
(Ex. 32). It was the god Apis, the sacred Egyptian
bull deity worshiped at Memphis on the Nile. Aaron declared that the pagan, Egyptian rites by which
the Israelites worshiped the calf were "a feast to the Lord" (verse
5). Did God feel honored? Did he approve of their using pagan customs to
worship him? Absolutely not! It was a great sin (verse 21), and 3,000 paid with
their lives (verse 28)! They had deceived themselves that what they were
doing was right. We are commanded not to seek to worship God with customs
borrowed from other religions (Deut. 12:29-32).
"Learn not the way of the heathen," God declares (Jer. 10:2). True Christians never meet paganism half way.
Pagan worship--whether "in Jesus' name" or not--remains pagan
worship! Christianity mixed with paganism is not Christianity at all.
Righteousness has no fellowship with unrighteousness (II Cor.
6:14). God simply will not accept that type of false
"worship." If God had wanted us to observe Christ's birthday, he
would have given us the exact date and specific instructions on how to
observe it. But he has not! Christmas is an invention of man, issuing from
pagan worship.
Chapter 3
SO YOU ARE NOT KEEPING CHRISTMAS?
SO You have decided it's time to
make some changes. This year you and your family are (sssh--don't
let the neighbors know!)--not going to keep Christmas! But it isn't quite as
easy as that though, is it? Christmas has become so much a part of most
people's lives that not to observe it can mean a major disruption. No
Christmas cards. What will Aunt Tess think? No
relatives over for Christmas dinner. No decorations. No lights or Santa
Claus. You'll have to try to avoid the office party, and you'd better write
to the school explaining that you don't want little Fred to play an angel in
the Christmas play. And no tree. I remember the first time we didn't have a
tree. It had always been a feature in our house. We would go to a lot of
trouble to decorate it beautifully, and then put it in the front window for
all to see. A good-looking tree was a status symbol in our neighborhood and,
though I do say it myself, ours was one of the best and most impressive. But
we noticed in the Bible where God made some pretty pointed remarks about
decorated trees. Check it for yourself in Jeremiah 10:3-4. God said it was a
futile, pagan custom--a clear case of worshipping Christ in vain. So--no
tree. Even though we knew we had done the right thing, we really missed that
tree. The neighbors all had them, sparkling in their windows, but our window
remained dark. We missed it so much that we cheated a bit. We put up a few
decorations--not a tree, mind you, just a few bits and pieces to make the
place look more cheerful. And we had a Christmas dinner, only we didn't call
it that. It was only a celebration." We felt guilty about it, because we
knew we had compromised. It was just that the old way seemed so comfortable
and without a tree and all the rest of the paraphernalia, Christmas just
didn't seem like--er, Christmas. Jesus Christ knew
this would happen. He explained to His disciples that they would indeed miss
some aspects of the old way of life, and that even as they learned the truth
from him they would look back nostalgically from time to time. Jesus taught
an important lesson in Luke 5:36-39: "No one puts a piece from a new
garment on an old one; otherwise the new makes a tear, and also the piece
that was taken out of the new does not match the old" (verse 36). Any
seamstress understands that. New, unshrunk material
cannot be used to patch old, worn garments. When it shrinks, it will tear the
old cloth even worse than before. Jesus' second analogy is not quite so easy
for us to follow in the 20th century: "And no one puts new wine into old
wineskins; or else the new wine will burst the wineskins and be spilled, and
the wineskins will be ruined. But new wine must be put into new
wineskins" (verses 37-38). In New Testament times glass bottles were
rare, so wine was often transported in animal skins, usually from goats. They
made a strong, airtight and moisture-proof container, but you had to be
careful. New wine that had not finished fermenting gave off gas that would
expand the skins. A new wineskin had some "give" to it, and would
allow for the expansion. But old, used skins lost their elasticity. They
would burst. The wine would be spilled and the wineskin ruined. But why tell
people that? Jesus Christ's business was not to give the multitude helpful
household hints. Jesus was using a familiar situation to teach an aspect of
Christian living.
Withdrawal symptoms
When someone begins to
understand the teachings of the Bible, it is a totally new experience--unlike
anything he or she has ever known--like new wine or an unused piece of cloth.
Now, what most of us do is try to fit this new truth into our old way of
life. That is only natural, because it is hard to change, and no one likes to
admit having been wrong. The old way of life is familiar and comfortable, and
we want to hang on to as much of it as possible. How about you? Perhaps you
have fond memories of the Easter sunrise service,
the fun of Halloween and those beautiful candlelight carol services down at
the old family church. The truth comes smashing into inherited religious
ideas and preconceived notions of right and wrong. It challenges comfortable
beliefs, making you question things you have always done. This new way--even
if it is right--sometimes seems like an unwelcome intruder, and you find
yourself resenting it. Jesus warned us that that could happen: "And no
one, having drunk old wine, immediately desires new; for he says, 'The old is
better"' (verse 39). It is not surprising that so many people, even
though they acknowledge the truth, still prefer to cling to their old
beliefs. Or perhaps they do as my family did when we met the truth halfway,
with a sort of "unChristmas" celebration.
We didn't enjoy our "unChristmas." You
never can if you know that you are compromising with what is right. We were
trying to put our new wine in the old bottle, and we spoiled everything.
All the way
Don't make that mistake. If you
are beginning to understand what it means to be a real Christian, realize
that it is going to demand positive action on your part. You can't have it
both ways, observing this world's customs and still expecting the blessing of
the world tomorrow. "Why do you call Me 'Lord, Lord,' and do not the
things which I say?" Jesus thundered (Luke 6:46). He expects total commitment. He demands that we come
out of the Babylon of confusion that characterizes so much religion today.
So along with the excitement of learning new truth comes the responsibility
of making some painful decisions. Don't compromise. God does not want to take
from us anything that is good. His way of life is filled with exciting
experiences that mean something and lead somewhere, not empty, senseless but
often very expensive rituals. As you take the plunge and follow God's way of
life, you will begin to miss the "old wine" less and less. You will
see it for what it is--a hollow counterfeit of the real thing. God is showing
you the way to freedom from all that. Instead of looking back at the
fraudulent ways of this world, you will begin to anticipate the excitement of
helping others learn the truth in the world tomorrow.
Chapter 4
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
EACH YEAR our Personal
Correspondence Department answers numerous inquiries regarding the holiday
season.
1. You say that Christmas
observance does not come from the Bible. Where does it come from, then?
Where Christmas customs came
from is really no secret. You can read the origins of Christmas customs in
encyclopedias and other reference works, as well as in newspaper and magazine
articles that often appear during the Christmas season. The facts are readily
accessible. At the end of December and the beginning of January festive
celebrations were taking place in various nations of Europe
centuries before Jesus was born! When that festive season rolled around,
little children were filled with anticipation and excitement. The whole
family got busily involved in putting up decorations. Boughs of holly and
evergreen were assembled and placed about the house. The mistletoe was hung.
A tree was chosen and decorated with ornaments. It was a season of giving and
receiving presents, a time to sing songs, admire all the pretty lights and
burn the Yule log. There were parades with special floats, sumptuous meals
and merrymaking. All this and Jesus wasn't even born yet! In ancient times,
many of the earth's inhabitants, realizing their dependence upon the sun for
light, heat and the growing of crops, watched the sun's yearly course in the
heavens with deep interest. At different seasons, feasts and celebrations were
held to help, it was thought, the solar orb on its way. The end of December
was an especially significant time in the Northern Hemisphere. The days were
short. The sun was at its lowest point. Special festivals of thanksgiving and
encouragement to the sun were held. When, at the winter solstice, the days
began to lengthen, there was great celebration lasting into the first part of
January. The sun--the light of the world--had been (re)born! Such
festivities, once meant to honor the sun and its god, were freely adopted by
the spreading and increasingly popular "Christian" religion. Why
not, in the same way, honor Jesus--the real light of the world (even though
He was not actually born in December)? The modern version of the Christmas
tree is supposed to have originated in German lands in the Middle Ages. Since
evergreens were green throughout the dead of winter, people looked upon them
as especially imbued with life. It was in honor of the tree spirit or the
spirit of growth and fertility that greenery was a prominent part of ancient
pagan winter celebrations. The Romans trimmed trees with trinkets and toys at
that time of the year. The Druids tied gilded apples to tree branches. To
certain peoples an evergreen decorated with orbs and other fruit-like objects
symbolized the tree of life in the garden in Eden. Branches of holly and mistletoe were likewise revered.
Not only do these plants remain green through the winter months, but they
actually bear fruit at that time, once again a type of the spirits of fertility.
Still today, catching someone under a branch of mistletoe can serve as a
convenient springboard for romantic activity. Few people stop to wonder what
in the world such strange customs have to do with the birth of Jesus! The
ancients lit festive fires in the last part of December to encourage the
waning sun god, just as Christmas bonfires, candles and other lights burn
today at the same time of the year. Use of the "Yule log," part of
the "Yuletide" season, hearkens back to the ritual burning of a carefully
chosen log by the Druids. The word Yule comes from the old Anglo-Saxon word hweol, meaning "wheel," a round wheel being an
appropriate symbol for the sun. You thought the Christmas shopping spree was
a 20th century phenomenon? Listen to how fourth-century writer Libanius described end-of-the-year gift-giving and
partying in the ancient non-Christian Roman Empire:
"Everywhere may be seen ... well-laden tables.... The impulse to spend
seizes everyone. He who through the whole year has taken pleasure in saving
... becomes suddenly extravagant.... A stream of presents pours itself out on
all sides" (as quoted in Christmas in Ritual and Tradition). Of all
times in the year, it was indeed the season to be jolly. Drunkenness was
widespread. Fortunately, however, the modes of transportation in those days
did not lend themselves to the high rate of drunken-driver-induced traffic
fatalities that are part of the Christmas season in many nations today. An
important part of the pagan harvest festivities--beginning in
October-November with what has become Halloween--involved good and bad
spirits. In many lands, visitors--usually bringers of good or evil--made
their appearance in the winter season. Through blending pagan legends with
traditions about saints, certain figures emerged, with similar personalities.
We recognize them today in different nations as Santa Claus, Father
Christmas, St. Nicholas, St.
Martin, the Weihnachtsmann,
Pere Noel. Whatever name
is used, all these winter visitors fulfill a similar role. These fictional
persons--Christianizations" of the pagan
Germanic deities- -clearly perpetuate certain folk-ritual themes wherein
varying degrees of rewards and punishments were dealt out to the celebrants.
Through the centuries these customs came to be centered around
children. It is not too hard to see a connection between Santa using the
chimney or the shoes and stockings hung by the fireplace and the ancient
superstitions about hearth spirits. For thousands of years, especially among
the Chinese, it was customary to sweep and scour the house in preparation for
the visit of the hearth spirit. Each year, dressed in a pointed, fiery red
cap and red jacket, this fire god traveled from the distant heavens to visit
homes and distribute favors or punishments. Today he is welcomed in the
Western world each Christmas season. Popular Christmas customs, as we can
see, plainly reflect non-Christian legends and practices. Some of the very
Christmas customs observed today were once banned by the Catholic Council of
Rome, the English Parliament and the Puritans of New England. The logical
question to ask is, What is there about Christmas
that is Christian?
2. All right. So Christmas is
based on pagan traditions and myths. What is wrong with borrowing some of
those customs and using them to honor Jesus on His birthday?
If we are supposed to celebrate
Jesus' birthday, why doesn't the Bible give us the date of that event?
Elsewhere in the Scriptures, when God revealed certain days He wanted His
people to observe, no room was left for doubt as to when those days occurred.
The instructions were specific because God wanted His people to observe those
particular days. Why, then, the silence as to which day Christ was born? The
plain truth is that the Bible nowhere commands us to observe birthdays in the
first place! But an even more important point to consider is this: When
Jesus' name is applied to borrowed pagan ideas and practices, does Jesus
really feel honored? After all, it was Jesus Himself who told His people Israel not to seek to worship Him with customs borrowed from
other religions (Deut. 12:29-32).
Time and again He made it clear through His prophets that He wanted His
people to remain "cleansed ... of everything pagan" (Neh. 13:30,
Revised Authorized Version).
3. Even though I have ceased to
celebrate Christmas, is there anything wrong in continuing to exchange gifts
out of the motive of giving rather than wanting to follow pagan customs?
There is nothing wrong with
giving to others. Part of God's overall purpose for our existence is that we
learn to give instead of seeking to get. But a Christian needs to be careful
about giving a gift around Christmas time. The reason? Christians are to be
lights to the world. They must set the example of righteous living. To engage
in gift giving with those who are celebrating Christmas may give the
appearance to them that you are participating right along with them in
Christmas festivities. God tells us to come out of the religious system of
this world and to be "separate" (11 Cor. 6:14-18). How can a person be separate from such goings on
and continue at the same time to dabble in them? Why not give gifts at other
times of the year when they will be appreciated as spontaneously sincere and
heartfelt?
4. How do I tell my friends and
relatives that I no longer wish to exchange presents?
With a smile! That's right. Show
firmness, yet at the same time be relaxed and friendly about it. One of the
biggest mistakes you can make is to come across as a religious fanatic fired
up with purple-veined emotion on the subject. There's no need to make friends
and relatives feel condemned and guilty by what you say. Your example will be
testimony enough to them. Most of them haven't the faintest idea where
Christmas customs came from or why they are following them. It's more
superstition than it is religion. They're just doing what everyone around
them does. Many of the problems arising from the Christmas season can be
resolved if you apply three principles: (1) Stress your objection to the
commercialism of the season. Immediately you have everyone, with the possible
exception of some shopkeepers and commercial interests, on your side. Who can
deny that Christmas is a crassly commercial holiday, that it is budget-bustingly expensive? Who would not--especially as general
economic conditions worsen--rather spend the money on more needful items,
like maybe heating the house? Who does not dread the wearisome Christmas
shopping experience, the time-consuming uncertainty as to what to buy for
whom? All you have to say is you've had enough of it, that when you give a
gift you want to do it spontaneously instead of as a slave to some custom.
After the initial shock wears off, most people will respect your stand and
secretly wish they had the courage to do likewise. Some, in fact, heartened
by your example, may do just that! (2) Maintain a sense of humor. Let's face
it, cutting trees down and then setting them back up loaded with ornaments,
the whole gift-trading rigmarole, the thought of an overweight, bearded individual
decked out in flamboyant red and traveling through the air in a sled or some
other conveyance when he is not slithering up and down someone's
chimney--these and so many other traditions are ridiculous. Feel free to
point that out. Who can deny it? (3) Put the burden of proof on those who are
celebrating Christmas. It's not that there isn't overwhelming proof to back
you up in your decision to cease celebrating Christmas. There certainly is.
But most people have neither the time nor the interest for a detailed
explanation. So shift the burden of proof to them. Say, in effect, "If
you can show me where the Bible says I ought to observe Christmas, or where
it says early Christians celebrated Jesus' birthday, I will celebrate it
also!" The discussion will probably end very suddenly at that point. Of
course, if the person to whom you are speaking shows an obvious interest in
learning about the real origin of Christmas, you should be prepared to give
an appropriate answer.
5. What happens if someone gives
me a gift anyway? Should I return it?
If a person is testing you to
see how deeply your religious convictions lie, returning the gift is a proper
response. On the other hand, in cases where the person sincerely doesn't know
or comprehend your stand, a polite note of thanks for the gift and a brief
statement that you no longer observe the Christmas holiday may be sufficient.
By the way, you will find that most people will stop giving you Christmas
gifts anyway after a year or two of not receiving a gift from you in return.
6. My friends and relatives
continue to send me Christmas cards. Should I write back to each of them and
explain that I have quit celebrating Christmas?
A brief note to that effect may
be in order. As with gifts, most people will cease sending Christmas cards
when they stop getting them in return.
7. What do I tell my children
now that they will no longer be receiving presents at Christmas?
Why not tell them the truth? Why
not tell them that you have come to understand that the world is wrong in its
observance of Christmas and that you are going to do God's will because it is
better than Christmas? Be sure to emphasize the positive side--that God's way
is better than Christmas. As proof of this, tell your children you are going to
give gifts to them throughout the year because you love them all year long,
not just on Christmas Day. That, in turn, is precisely what they can tell
their friends who will be showing off their Christmas gifts. It is important
not to leave a void in your children's lives by removing Christmas observance
and putting nothing in its place. Arrange special activities with them often,
and especially centering around the Holy Days God
has ordained in the Scriptures--the days He does want us to observe. (For
more information, write for our free booklet Pagan Holidays- or God's Holy
Days--Which?)
8. Is there anything I can do to
prevent my child from having to participate in Christmas activities at
school?
One of the most important steps
you as a Christian parent can take is to discuss the subject with the
children's teachers, addressing the problem ahead of time. Politely inform
the teachers involved that you do not observe certain holidays and that you
do not want to have your children take part in celebrations centering around those days. Seek to avoid, as much as possible,
leaving a teacher in a difficult situation with children to teach but not
knowing what to have them do while others, for example, are drawing Santas. You can advise that your children may draw winter
scenes or snowmen instead of things immediately associated with Christmas. If
the whole class is having a Christmas party perhaps you could offer to come
to school and take your children home that afternoon to relieve the teacher
from having to find something else for them to do. In any case, try to be
very cooperative with school officials. Above all, ask God for wisdom, grace
and favor in their sight. Your children themselves, especially as they get
older, will be a determining factor as to whether they become involved in
worldly religious holiday activities at school or elsewhere away from home.
You can't be with them every minute. This underlines the absolute need to
provide positive instruction at home. If children are convinced in their own minds
that they should not participate in certain activities, much of the battle is
already won.
9. It is a standard policy for
the company where I work to give all employees a Christmas bonus. Should I
accept this bonus?
Bonuses given at the end of the
year are usually not considered as Christmas gifts. They are often given in
gratitude for work done throughout the preceding year. It is logical to wait
until the end of the year before giving such a bonus, and Christmas seems to
be as good an occasion as any. Most large companies are not interested one
way or the other in the personal convictions of their employees and, when
that's the case, there is no reason to refuse the bonus. If you are working
for a smaller company where you know your employer personally, it may be
advisable to mention to him or her that you don't celebrate Christmas. If he
or she wants to give you the bonus regardless, as simply a gift or token of
appreciation, you can accept it with a clear conscience.
10. Some relatives have invited
me to their house for dinner on Christmas Day. Should I refuse the
invitation?
Not necessarily. It depends on
the nature of the occasion. Since you understand the truth about Christmas,
to you the day will be just another ordinary day of the year. And to you the
simple fact of eating a meal with others on that day is no different from
eating one with them on any other day. What matters in this case, though, is
how your relatives will regard the occasion. If they look on the meal as part
of Christmas festivities and place religious significance upon it, then you
would be out of place there. Your attendance could give the impression that
you are observing Christmas with them or, if they know about your beliefs,
that you are willing to compromise on your beliefs. On the other hand, if the
meal is merely a convenient opportunity for a family get-together, and there
is no objectionable connotation placed upon the meal, then it might be all
right to accept the invitation. Better be prepared to answer some questions,
though, because sooner or later the conversation is sure to focus on why you
don't observe Christmas.
11. What should I say when
someone wishes me "Merry Christmas"?
It is often sufficient to
respond with a question such as "Where has this last year gone?" or
"It's that time of year again, isn't it?" or "Do you think it
is going to snow?" or even a parting statement on an entirely unrelated
subject such as "Good-bye now" or "Have a good day!" The
surprising fact is that few individuals will even notice that you haven't
wished "Merry Christmas" in return, so meaningless is the
expression. At other times, a smile and a "Thank you" (meaning you
are grateful for their concern) may be more appropriate. If you have a
question regarding the Christmas holiday and it has not been answered here,
please feel free to write our Personal Correspondence Department at our
address nearest you. They will be glad to help you.
|